Institute in October.
Her comments came shortly
before the SEC released a draft
of its strategic plan for the next
five years. The plan outlines 70
initiatives, which include stricter
enforcement to “obtain swift and
firm sanctions, while remaining fair
and reasonable.”
ARBITRATION
RATE-A-NEUTRAL
Group to offer evaluations
of arbitrators, mediators
By Virginia Groark
ROAD MAP FOR REFORM
EVEN AS THE SEC CALLS FOR A STEP-
up of self-reporting, the agency itself is taking steps to centralize the
thousands of tips and complaints it
receives, with the aim of aiding investigations, better spotting trends
and avoiding another massive fraud
like Bernard Madoff’s multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme that went
uninvestigated for 16 years.
SEC Inspector General David
Kotz’s proposals also include easing
the process for junior-level enforcement attorneys to bring concerns to
top managers.
“I think it will take months or
maybe a year before it’s really running efficiently because there are a
lot of steps,” Walter says, “but it is
moving along as fast as we can move
it along. And there’s a lot that’s being done today to try to replicate as
much of that without the system in
place because we want to make sure
there is nothing we are missing.”
Paul R. Lovejoy, United Airlines
general counsel and secretary, and
Walter say conversations between
the commissioner and corporate
counsel at the Corporate Counsel
Institute forums let both sides hear
new proposals firsthand and voice
concerns.
In her prepared remarks, Walter
also addressed SEC support for increased liability for credit raters;
the need for the SEC to issue guidance for corporate disclosures on climate change; and the possible use
of international financial reporting
standards, a set of global rules for
financial statements.
The SEC should “move forward
to IFRS if and only if it is the right
thing to do for U.S. investors,”
Walter says. SEC Chairman Mary
Schapiro has said the agency will
discuss IFRS through the fall. ■
WITH FORTUNE 500 COMPANIES DEMANDING MORE TRANSPARENCY in the dispute resolution process, a New York City-based non- profit has decided to start rating arbitrators and mediators. The International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution hopes its online ratings will be available early
next year. Its members will be able to use their passwords to access the
information on the organization’s website.
The service is believed to be the first of its kind for alternative dispute
resolution. It was developed after institute
members—largely Fortune 500 companies
and their lawyers—complained there wasn’t
enough information available on mediators
and arbitrators, called neutrals, according to
Kathleen Bryan, the organization’s president
and chief executive officer.
Some neutrals have questions about the
voluntary rating system, Bryan says. But the
organization hopes they will recognize the
time has come for such ratings. “This is
something that the clients are demanding,”
she says.
The system’s success depends on the
cooperation of roughly 600 neutrals the
institute has approved to do complex busi-ness-to-business mediation and arbitration.
Those who sign up must provide 20 refer-
ences to a third-party company, Positively Neutral, which will interview
the references and then score the neutrals in a variety of categories, such
as whether they are good
case managers. Aggregate
averages will be compiled
along with anecdotes and
will be shared with the neutrals, who either can agree
to have the information posted or opt out.
To account for bad scores
from sore losers, the arbitrators’ ratings will be broken down into information from those who prevailed
and those who lost.
The American Arbitration Association, which has a roster of about 7,700
mediators and arbitrators, doesn’t have a rating system but would consider
instituting one if the demand arises, says Eric Tuchmann, the AAA’s general
counsel in New York City. Currently, it screens its neutrals, sends surveys to
conduct evaluations and offers an interviewing process so parties can help select an arbitrator or mediator, Tuchmann says.
Bryan expects some neutrals will take a wait-and-see attitude before signing up, noting some have suggested the ratings won’t include enough information.
“Maybe,” she says, “but it’s certainly more than exists right now.” ■