CHASING A DREAM
Living up to the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights remains a struggle
BY KRISTIN CHOO
THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS CAME INTO
existence amid the still-smoldering rubble of World War II.
The hope was that the citizens of the planet would not be
forced to endure that kind of carnage again. But 60 years
later, reality still hasn’t caught up with the dream.
Both sides of the story were explored in depth at a recent ABA program
commemorating the U.N. General Assembly’s vote on Dec. 10, 1948, to
adopt the declaration. None of the U.N.’s 58 members then dissented,
but there were two absences and eight abstentions: Saudi Arabia, South
Africa and the members of the
Soviet bloc.
While the declaration has no
binding legal effect, it became
a pillar of customary law in the
postwar world and gave birth to
the modern human rights movement. The declaration served as
the basis for two binding U.N. human rights agreements: the International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights, and
the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights. Several
human rights institutions, including the European Court of Human
Rights, the International Criminal
Court and the U.N. Human Rights
Council, created by the General
Jerome
Assembly in 2006, can trace their
Shestack
roots to the declaration.
The principle of universality
was a key achievement of the
declaration, said Michael Posner,
president of Human Rights First,
an advocacy group based in New
York City. “It said that, by virtue
of our humanity, every person on this Earth is entitled
to certain core protections,” Posner said during a panel
discussion. “It doesn’t matter what your citizenship is.
It doesn’t matter if you have a green card. It doesn’t
even matter if your government doesn’t believe it. You
have those rights.”
The declaration also transformed human rights from
a domestic matter for each nation to address as it saw fit into an issue
of international concern, Posner told the multinational gathering at
the Manhattan headquarters of the Association of the Bar of the City
of New York.
But despite these achievements, Posner and other speakers voiced
concern that the human rights movement has stalled in recent years.
Some said it is particularly troubling that some of the worst violations
of human rights law in recent years have been attributed to permanent
For more
Read the Declaration
of Human Rights and
related documents
ABAJournal.com
/magazine
PHOTOGRAPH BY ZAVE SMITH
members of the U.N. Security
Council—including China, Russia
and the United States—in pursuit
of policies to fight terrorism.
“If permanent members of the
Security Council flagrantly violate
international law and the rules of human rights, they send a terrible message to the world,” said Hans Corell,
a Swedish lawyer and former U.N.
legal counsel and undersecretary-general for legal affairs.
HIGH HOPES
U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICIES DURING
the Bush administration came in for
widespread criticism at the same
time that speakers expressed
strong hopes that the Obama
administration will make hu-
man rights a policy priority.
Posner said U.S. policy tra-
ditionally has been based on
the idea of exceptionalism—
“that sense that we are so
good at this that we don’t
need to be bound by interna-
tional standards.” But in re-
cent years it also turned
sharply away from human
rights principles expressed in
the universal declaration. “It’s
the notion that these core val-
ues underlying all of what the
human rights regime is about
have been trumped by a new
theory of national security,”
he said. “It’s the notion that
war trumps law.”
Soon after taking office in
January, President Barack
Obama announced that the
Guantanamo detention facili-
ty would be closed and that
policies for interrogating detainees
would be changed, but there is pres-
sure on the new administration to do
more.
On March 31, Obama announced
that the United States would run for
a seat on the U.N. Human Rights
Council—a body the U.S. refused to
join under the Bush administration—when elections are held this
month.
The conference also featured intense debate on just how universal
human rights principles set forth in
Continued on page 67